Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Αμερική. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Αμερική. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Δευτέρα 24 Νοεμβρίου 2008

Αλλαγή κανόνων και όχι συντήρηση του υπάρχοντος τραπεζικού συστήματος

Σήμερα, μετά την επένδυση των μισών περίπου από τα 700 δισ. δολλάρια που διατέθηκαν από το Κογκρέσσο για την στήριξη των αποθεματικών του τραπεζικού συστήματος των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών, τα στοιχεία δείχνουν ότι το Υπουργείο Οικονομικών και η Κεντρική Τράπεζα των ΗΠΑ δεν έχουν επιτύχει τον στόχο της μείωσης του κόστους ή της συνέχειας στη διαθεσιμότητα των κεφαλαίων.

Αντίθετα, οι μεγάλες τράπεζες μειώνουν την καταναλωτική πίστη, αυξάνουν προμήθειες, επιβάλλουν πρόσθετες χρεώσεις  και αναζητούν τρόπους για την περαιτέρω ισχυροποίηση των ισολογισμών τους.

Αν δεν αντιστραφούν αυτές οι τάσεις, η συντονισμένη δράση σε ομοσπονδιακό δεν θα επιφέρει τα επιθυμητά αποτελέσματα, θα εμβαθύνει την ύφεση και δεν θα επαναφέρει το προηγούμενο κλίμα στις αγορές.

Διαβάστε την συνέχεια εδώ:

Τετάρτη 5 Νοεμβρίου 2008

Από τα πρώτα σχόλια με την ευκαιρία της εκλογής του B. Obama στην προεδρία των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών

Διθυραμβικά, ζωντάνα και γεμάτα από αισιοδοξία είναι τα περισσότερα σχόλια του Τύπου και των απλών πολιτών σε ολόκληρο τον κόσμο, φαντάζομαι, πιο πολύ στο εσωτερικό των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών αλλά και στις χώρες με τις οποίες έχει κατά κάποιο τρόπο δεσμούς ο νεοεκλεγής Πρόεδρος, όπως η Ινδονησία και η Κένυα. Αργότερα, πιθανόν να γράψω και την δική μου άποψη σχετικά, κυρίως για ό,τι έχει να κάνει με την χώρα μας όμως για την ώρα, αξίζει να δούμε κάποια σχόλια και σκέψεις, από άλλες περιοχές αυτού του πλανήτη.

Από δεκάδες αναρτήσεις, άρθρα και σχόλια, επέλεξα να αναδημοσιεύσω από το ιστολόγιο Kenyan Pundit την άποψη του διαχειριστή του, η οποία πιστεύω ότι είναι πολύ πραγματική, ανθρώπινη και αντικειμενική και είναι μία άποψη κοινή για πολλά εκατομμύρια συνανθρώπων μας σε ολόκληρο τον κόσμο:

Like most of the rest of the world, I’m hoping that I’m waking up to a moment in history. Beyond the sheer glee of an Obama victory, there’s just the awesomeness of having been around during what will be one for the record books. During my student days I remember being wistful at times when hearing about historic leaders and historic times, and now there’s an opportunity to live it. A lot of ink has been spilled over why Obama is popular globally and just how disappointed people will be because of high expectations - I think that’s missing the larger point. Will Obama under-deliver, probably yes. But when was the last time an individual (especially that young people can relate to) inspired THE WORLD to think that things could be different and better, and that there is such a thing as a non-crappy politician?

And for those (Kenyans) who are being derisive about Kenyans trying to “own” Obama. Bah! Yes, it’s unrealistic to think that his election will change U.S. policy practically as far as Kenya goes, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with Kenyans going overboard with Obama-mania and what he represents for us.

Now if only we can translate our aspirations for him to our aspirations for Kenyan leaders! Would Barack Obama have made it as a Kenyan politican (or even African) - almost certainly not…we excel in trashing intellectual, ethical, different, individuals who want to participate in public service. In Obama’s own words, “…For as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on earth is my story even possible.” Lets work to change this people.

Kudos America for doing the right thing and for reminding us that the American dream is still alive and well.

Τρίτη 4 Νοεμβρίου 2008

ΗΠΑ: Εκλογικά αποτελέσματα σε πραγματικό χρόνο

Απ' ό,τι φαίνεται, ιδιαίτερα τις τελευταίες ώρες, το ενδιαφέρον των περισσότερων από εμάς στρέφεται γύρω από τις αμερικανικές εκλογές και τα δύο κεντρικά πρόσωπα αυτής της εκλογικής αναμέτρησης (Ομπάμα και Μακέιν) που, με τον έναν ή τον άλλον τρόπο, αναμένεται να διαδραματίσουν καταλυτικό ρόλο τόσο στο εσωτερικό της χώρας, όσο και στο διεθνές πεδίο... 

Αρκετά ιστολόγια, όπως το nylon.gr ή το reality-tape.com, θα παρακολουθούν από κοντά την όλη διαδικασία καθ' όλη την διάρκεια της νύχτας με σχόλια και παρατηρήσεις, ενώ θα παραθέτουν βίντεο και links σε ιστολόγια και ιστοσελίδες,  με σκοπό την πιο έγκυρη ενημέρωση όλων μας σε πραγματικό χρόνο, οπότε  δεν νομίζω πως θα έχω τίποτε περισσότερο να προσφέρω. Το μόνο που μπορώ να κάνω, έτσι ώστε να "πλαισιώσω" την όλη αυτή ενημερωτική διαδικασία, είναι η ανάρτηση του εκλογικού χάρτη από το τηλεοπτικό δίκτυο msnbc, ο οποίος θα ενημερώνεται αυτόματα με την ολοκλήρωση των κατά τόπων διαδικασιών και δημοσίευσης των αποτελεσμάτων τόσο για την προεδρία, όσο και για την Βουλή των Αντιπροσώπων και την Γερουσία.

Τρίτη 14 Οκτωβρίου 2008

McCain's Choice: Lose With Honor or Lose In Disgrace

With the Presidential election only 3 weeks away, John McCain faces a stark choice: Will he go down in history as a principled conservative who lost an election standing on his convictions? Or will he go down as an opportunist who lost while bringing out the darkest elements in American politics?

With the national and international financial system in a midst of collapse, Americans worried about saving their jobs and their homes, the Iraq War lasting longer than World War II, and Osama Bin Laden still holed up in the mountains of Pakistan, 72 year old John McCain is a man whose ideas and persona are out of step with this moment in history.

After 8 disastrous years of Republican rule under George W. Bush, all of the tides of history point towards a Democratic victory on November 4th. Obama's principle obstacle to the Presidency has been whether a majority of Americans were ready to accept him as Commander in Chief. After his performance in the first two debates, and his calm and steady response to the financial crisis, Obama seems to have passed that threshold. Obama holds commanding leads in national polls and in all the states won by Kerry in 2004, and is also leading in 9 states won by Bush. The election now appears to be shaping up as a possible electoral vote landslide combined with large Democratic pick-ups in the House and Senate.

read the whole article here:

Παρασκευή 10 Οκτωβρίου 2008

UNASUR Moves to Regional Legislation

Experts of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) took the firststeps to create a regional system in legal issues, as part of the integration process that is currently in progress.

In three days of meetings at the 3rd UNASUR Judicial Power President Summit, the participants achieved agreements in issues as extradition, exhortation, alternative mechanisms to solve conflicts and exequatur.

The final statement of the meeting held in Margarita Island, in the Venezuelan Caribbean, highlighted the need to establish mechanisms to facilitate extradition and create center for conciliation and arbitration to make progress in the regional project.

read the whole article here:

update #1, 19/10/08: UNASUR decides to establish South American Parliament in Bolivia (source: Aftermath News)

The Union of South American Nations decided at a meeting last Friday, to set up a South American Parliament in Bolivia in order to promote its international integration in accordance to EU's example.

Chilean President Michele Bachelet, UNASUR’s temporary president, and Bolivian President Evo Morales opened the meeting in Bolivia’s Cochabamba province which drew representatives from 12 countries in the region.

read the whole article here: / originally appeared at xinhua net

Πέμπτη 25 Σεπτεμβρίου 2008

Σχετικά με την εξωτερική πολιτική των Η.Π.Α.

Την περασμένη Δευτέρα το  "The Chicago Council on Global Affairs" δημοσίευσε μία έκθεση αναφορικά με τα αποτελέσματα έρευνας που διεξήγαγε (3-15 Ιουλίου 2008) σε δείγμα 1500 περίπου αμερικανών πολιτών, με σκοπό τον εντοπισμό των στοιχείων εκείνων που θα προσδιορίσουν την συμπεριφορά του εκλογικού σώματος κατά τις προσεχείς προεδρικές εκλογές στις Η.Π.Α.

 Το ερωτηματολόγιο δεν βασίστηκε μόνο σε θέματα εσωτερικής πολιτικής αντίθετα, έδωσε πολύ μεγάλο βάρος στην γνώμη των ερωτηθέντων σχετικά με την εφαρμοζόμενη εξωτερική πολιτική της χώρας αλλά και σε μια σειρά επίκαιρων διεθνών ζητημάτων, που με τον ένα ή τον άλλον τρόπο επηρεάζουν την δυναμική - και κατ' επέκταση την εικόνα - της χώρας τους διεθνώς.

διαβάστε την έκθεση εδώ:

Δυστυχώς, δεν έχω προλάβει ακόμη να μελετήσω τα ευρήματα αυτής της έρευνας, για να μπορέσω να δώσω ακόμη περισσότερα στοιχεία και να παρουσιάσω τις δικές μου σκέψεις σχετικά... Πιστεύω όμως ότι μπορεί ν' αποτέλεσει ένα χρήσιμο επιπρόσθετο εργαλείο για όλους όσους μελετούν την Αμερικανική πολιτική σκηνή.

Δευτέρα 1 Σεπτεμβρίου 2008

Latin America Looks Towards European Union

North American Congress on Latin America

γράφει η Sujatha Fernandes

Latin America, once thought of as America's "backyard," has been moving further out of the orbit of the United States in the last ten years or so. As the testing ground for Washington-imposed neoliberal policies, Latin America has now become the locus for a series of left wing leaders who are contesting these policies, and as they do so, they have been turning towards allies in Europe, China, and the Middle East as a counter to US hegemony. Europe, in particular, has begun sketching out alternative policies that make the US seem increasingly isolated in its approach to Latin America.

Between the mid 1970s and the mid 1980s, structural adjustment measures of privatization, deregulation, and market-based growth were formulated into a coherent and extensive set of neoliberal principles known as the Washington Consensus, and reforms were urged on Latin American countries. The decade of the 1990s was marked by the relative hegemony of the neoliberal model and its application throughout the region.

The neoliberal model was widely proclaimed by Washington to be a panacea that could resolve the foreign debt crisis and spark economic growth through reviving the private sector. A key component of free trade policies were the proposed trade agreements known as the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), which would reduce barriers to trade between the United States and countries in the Americas. The first agreement was signed between Mexico, Canada and the US, known as North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA required the imposition of structural adjustment policies in Mexico, and was met with a dramatic uprising by the Zapatista National Liberation Army (EZLN) on January 1, 1994, the day it came into effect.

In the last decade, there have been nationwide mobilizations across Central and South America against privatization and free trade agreements. Several leaders challenging the neoliberal orthodoxy to greater and lesser degrees came to power: Hugo Chávez in Venezuela in 1998, Lula Inacio Lula da Silva in Brazil in 2003, Nestor Kirchner in Argentina in 2003, Tabaré Vázquez in Uruguay in 2004, Evo Morales in Bolivia in 2005, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua in 2006, and Rafael Correa in Ecuador in 2006. The national mobilizations, the ousting of neoliberal politicians, and the election of left wing leaders, marked a deeper rejection of the neoliberal model than the earlier cycle of protests.

read the whole article here:

Τρίτη 20 Μαΐου 2008

Barack Obama’s "Change"

γράφει η Sincerae Smith
When Christos extended an invitation to me to write on his blog about Barack Obama I was flattered, excited, and a tad reluctant. My reluctance was mainly due to me not being much of a political person. I will discuss politics in a limited manner, but usually my opinions are defined as being too naive for a tough world. I am too much the aesthete, intellectual, and devout Christian to have sophisticated views on how my country should be run. Well to some Barack Obama’s views and his slogan involving the word “Change””may appear naive too, but they are not after 8 years of being governed by one of the most corrupt regimes in American history. I think Barack Obama is a realist, populist (in a positive sense) and a true patriot who knows that it is time for change if this country is to survive.

Before I began writing this, a comment made by an American author who writes on US foreign policy and a quote from the only book in The Bible to not mention God came to mind. First, the author is Chalmers Johnson who wrote the trilogy Blowback, The Sorrows of Empire, and Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic.

Johnson said in an interview about 3 years ago, that the government needed to be honest with the American people that the country is facing economic and social collapse in the very near future. Being an avid reader of history with an analytical mind, I had already noticed the signs when Johnson made his comment. In the last year our economy has rapidly eroded with increasing inflation in food and fuel prices. Americans are losing jobs. The dollar, the top currency for decades, cannot compete very well with the Euro. Americans who subscribed to the American dream of owning a home as a privilege of citizenship have lost their homes. Prices have gone up, but wages have stagnated. The country is mired in two wars that I have predicted we will be in for the next two centuries. This year it looks as if the collapse of America may be in full swing. Second, my other reflection that came to mind is in the biblical book of Esther. Queen Esther’s cousin Mordecai told her that because they and their people lived in perilous times it may be that God had chosen her to be a queen married to a pagan king for such a time as this.”

I believe that Barack Obama arrived on the scene like the biblical Esther for “a time as this” in this nation’s and this world’s history. He may fail to be elected at the next president of the United States of America and if he is elected his policies may fail, but I think at this point he has great promise and we all have very little to lose.

I have long said that America probably would not be destroyed from without, but from within because of so many monumental problems that many citizens and many of our governmental officials refuse to face up to as existent. For eight years this country has been governed by a president and his clique who is almost like no other in our history. These are people who glorify war, hegemony, their group’s interests, the rich, and seduced many people into being dupes to get them in office. They created a climate of fear and secrecy. For eight years we have had what amounted to nationalism than patriotism. It has been a troublesome and tragic time in our history under the leadership of George W. Bush. Americans have yet to face up to the fact that many of our leaders may be war criminals if it is ever confirmed that the war in Iraq was deliberately entered into solely by governmental use of misinformation and propaganda.

So what does Barack Obama have to offer with America at a crossroads? What exactly does he mean by “Change”? With Barack Obama, change will mean that American policy both domestic and foreign will be reformed. His focus will not be on pouring billions of dollars into projects like the War on Terror but giving back to the American people by restructuring our economy, educational and governmental system. It will truly be government of the people, by the people, for the people as President Abraham Lincoln said in the Gettysburg Address in 1863. Barack Obama’s policies will be more inward looking with issues here at home placed under the magnifying glass rather than so much intense interference abroad.

Beginning at home, all Americans will be given a fair opportunity to receive health care through a universal plan that will include insurance companies, employers, and the government working together to insure that everyone can afford health insurance. Whereas President Bush opposed a national health care plan for the nation’s children, Obama will make such a plan the law. At this point in time, Americans pay more on hospitalization and medicine than any other nation on earth. This is troubling to me because if we can wage wars that disrupt and destroy lives, why is it so difficult for this nation to invest in health care for all of its’ citizens? A few years ago I saw an Italian physician on television who was involved in Doctors without Borders, and he said that one of humanity’s basic human rights is affordable health care. I agreed with him then and now.

More change will come in the form of Barack Obama offering tax breaks to working and middle class American families. The legacy of the Bush years of offering tax breaks to the wealthy was killing the middle class. The middle class was burdened with the highest taxes which was unfair and to me irrational. Americans whether wealthy, middle class, or poor are drowning in debt. America’s economy functions on the accumulation of debt. With Obama credit card and mortgage companies will be penalized for dishonest and predatory lending practices. The public will also be informed about which companies to stay away from.

For some years now we have been warned that there will not be any funds left for the government to pay social security to America’s elderly after the current generation of senior citizens has passed on. Barack Obama has plans for programs that will allow America’s seniors to receive enough funds to live on through the government increasing social security savings and businesses offering retirement programs authorized by the government.

During the eight year Bush administration many government contracts went to big corporations that were sometimes aligned with people like Vice President Dick Cheney. This was the case with some of the oil and natural gas companies which met with the vice president to influence energy policies. Under Obama, this will not happen because transparency in how the government spends tax dollars will be revealed through a national database similar to Google where citizens can see how their tax dollars were spent. No longer will the government be influenced by pressure put on by special interest groups that come to Washington to push their agendas.

Obama says that even at this point he has ignored the requests of various groups to place their hold on him. The days of what I see as a form of bribery and certainly corruption will be a shoved aside relic of the Bush years.

Other domestic programs will discourage businesses from moving abroad for cheap labor and bigger tax cuts. More jobs need to be created in America, not shipped abroad. Obama wants to see an economy which encourages more trade than total consumerism which we exist under now. If an American looks at the products he or she purchases, it immediately becomes evident that almost nothing is made in America anymore.

Only 77% of young Americans graduate from high school. Though the Bush administration tried to reform the educational system through the “No Child Left Behind” program, the program has become a nightmare of rigorous testing for students and teachers being penalized for student failure. The program has had fair to poor results. America has showered money on its schools in the last eight years with amazing technology and better text books. Still the high school dropout rate is the highest of the developed nations. After high school, the students who excel and are accepted into a college or university are faced with exorbitant tuition fees. Most graduate with debt in the tens of thousands of dollars. If an American goes to medical school, debt can reach over $100,000! Barack Obama has a plan so higher education can be affordable for all who are equipped to attend an institution of higher learning.

To be a farmer has become such an expensive endeavor that the occupation is in danger of going extinction here in the US. Higher costs in fuel, fertilizer, equipment, and seeds have crippled the industry. Erratic weather patterns have also added to the problems of the American farmer and driving up food prices. Obama plans to do all that he can to make farming an affordable occupation especially through tax cuts. He will also set up a program that will encourage American youth to once again consider farming as a livelihood.

Even though gasoline costs here in the US is almost half of what it is in parts of Europe , weekly escalating prices have become a great burden on most Americans. Most of us have other financial obligations and need to own a car just to get to and from work. With the price of a barrel of oil now over $120 and a weak dollar, Americans are hurting in ways financially that many could not have dreamed of eight years ago. Instead of trying to bribe or coerce oil producing nations into supplying America with cheap oil, Barack Obama is adamant that this country look for alternative fuels for cost and environmental purposes. With the environment, he is not in denial like the Bush administration has been about global warming. Obama takes the issue seriously and will work here at home and abroad with governments to reverse the effects of climate change.

America has some of the slowest internet of any country on the planet. High speed internet is very costly. I pay a little over $60 a month just to have wireless broadband for my laptop. Under Obama, the plan is for more Americans to have faster internet that is affordable. People in rural communities who cannot get broadband will get access.

Barack Obama is very concerned about the plight of women. He wants to change the situation here at home where women continue to be paid lesser wages than men and do not get enough paid leave of absence from their jobs after giving birth. He will have the government fund afterschool programs for children nationwide so parents do not have to wonder where their children are. Even though I feel that abortion is wrong, and I ponder whether there are any long term health consequences of girls and women who get them, I am not greatly troubled that Barack Obama is pro-choice. Pro-choice means that he believes the final decision should be a personal decision whether to terminate a pregnancy. Domestic violence against women is an ongoing problem here at home, so Obama will appoint a special advisor to keep him informed about issues nation wide.

Other domestic issues that Barack Obama wants to focus on are guaranteed civil rights for all US citizens so that irregularities of wages, discriminatory job hiring, problems in the criminal justice system, the rise in hate crimes, etc. can be combated.

America now is the home of possibly over 12 million illegal aliens who mainly come here from Central and South America. However, we do have people residing here from Europe and others places who continue to reside here even though their visas have expired. Some illegal aliens have come here with their families. Others have started families while in the states. If you are born in America and your parents are not, you still get automatic citizenship. Therefore, portions of these types of families are legal citizens and others are not. Barack Obama does not want to split up families, but he wants the immigration system to be reformed. People whose visas have expired and who do not have families here will have to go back to their countries. Companies who knowingly hire illegal aliens will be fined. American workers have to come first.

I am sure that the rest of the world is waiting with bated breath to see what Barack Obama has to offer as far as change in America’s foreign policy is concerned. Nearly eight years of the Bush administration has left us with a tarnished reputation on the world stage. We have not exactly become an international pariah, but people have certainly lost what confidence they had in us. Some with include many Iraqis say that the Iraq would become more stable if only American troops were withdrawn. Even though I was against the war from the outset just as Obama was who voted against it, I realize that the occupation cannot end on the day a new president takes office next January. I think the occupation is wrong, but the Iraqis cannot be left to fend for themselves in a country that is debilitated and destroyed. They are America’s responsibility since we wrecked their country. Obama knows this too. He has promised that if he is elected, American forces will leave Iraq in 16 months from the day he takes office. He expects that in the interim before the withdrawal for Iraq’s leader to grow up,”stop the bickering, and become stewards of the country they head.

There are 2 million Iraqi refugees in countries neighboring Iraq. Iraqi refugees are especially concentrated in Syria and Jordan which are two small and poor to provide for their needs. Though given housing, often these refugees cannot get legal status to get jobs. Also jobs are scarce even for these country’s citizens. Some of these proud people who were highly educated have been reduced to prostitution or selling their daughters into the sex industry catering often to rich customers from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states. It is a very sad story. Because they have a common language and culture, Iraqi refugees become embedded in the areas where they live and are difficult to track down and identify as being in need of aid by aid agencies. Barack Obama will organize a program to locate and help Iraqi refugees in countries neighboring Iraq .

Veterans from wars can sometimes become disposable people in the way the government often neglects their needs. More veterans from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have come back home from the frontlines with chronic mental illness than did veterans of the Vietnam War. Ten percent of Vietnam veterans were tormented by mental illness. Twenty-nine percent of veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq come back broken by mental illness. Many come from poor backgrounds and end up as basically cannon fodder, sent repeatedly for long tours of duty because there have never been enough military personnel to successfully pull off a project as ambitious as the War on Terror. Now we are seeing the fruits of mismanagement and poor planning. One of my brother’s childhood playmates joined the army after he lost his job and was divorced marriage. I think it was the character Yevgraf in the movie Doctor Zhivago who said that happy men do not join the army. Now my brother’s playmate may be ruined for life. While in Iraq, the helicopter he was on was shot down. Everyone on broad except him was killed. Shortly after he recovered from his wounds, he was sent back to combat. On this second tour, he mentally broke down.

Today he is sent from one hospital for veterans to another. Sometime he is allowed home to be with his parents. Many Americans have learned that war is not something to be played with and entered into lightly and swiftly the way our leaders did. Barack Obama has stressed the mistakes made and how he wants to bring American soldiers out of the morass they have been put in. He will make sure that American veterans with mental illnesses will have access to adequate psychiatric services so the continuing problem of veterans committing suicide or wandering off into the desert and anonymity of homelessness will be brought to a minimum.

American policy has been to not have dialogue with our deepest enemies or those we just do not like. This began before George W. Bush. He was not an inventor of this type of policy, but he and his advisors certainly augmented it. The world has reached such a juncture in levels and number of crises that not trying to establish dialogue with people we do not agree with is no longer feasible. Like Obama says the approach of not having dialogue shows arrogance. He wants America to truly be a moral force and a force for good morale in the world. The way to do this is to draw international support.

Americans tend to have an individualist outlook on life, an every man or woman for his or her self attitude. The Bush regime took this behavior to the extreme, and now in his final months as president he is trying to do damage control after telling the world you are either for us or against us and insulting close allies in the early years of the “War on Terror”. Look at the results. George Bush has the poorest rating of any American president since the polling systems were put into place. He and his clique singlehandedly brought America down in the eyes of the world. Now, Barack Obama wants to show what enlighten leadership and cooperation can do. This is not showing weakness or appeasement. It is showing that he is not in denial that this world is in peril. Nations are going to have to work together at the table if we and the planet are to survive.

This is only a brief summary of Barack Obama’s agenda for “change”. There is more. Barack Obama is a highly principled individual. America has been run by mostly older white gentleman since its’founding. Barack Obama is what we call in the states mixed or bi-racial. He is the son of a full blooded African father from Kenya and a white mother from America. I feel that he is a mixture of the best of both worlds. His mother taught him early to have compassion for people and their plight. She educated him about the importance of public service. He obviously listened to her well, because previous to him to becoming a household name nationally and internationally he had been a public servant in Chicago helping the poor and needy and giving attention to women’s issues. He was looking out for the most vulnerable then; he wants to continue to want to do this on a much larger stage.

America has been investing in militarism here and abroad for well over a century. It is time with so much neglected here stateside that the country is invested in. We have in many ways lost abroad and are on the verge of losing so much more here. Barack Obama has a sound, sober, idealism which is also realism about what will happen if America remains on the course it has been on. Now is the time for all Americans to reflect inward about the destiny of this land which has been a leader in the world for a century. We are losing the American Dream; losing America; losing our way. Barack Obama is the right person for president for “such a time as this”. We need change.

Σάββατο 2 Φεβρουαρίου 2008

Τρεις και σήμερα για την super Tuesday

Με αυτή μου την ανάρτηση, θα επιχειρήσω μια συνολική προσέγγιση στα μηνύματα που διατυπώνονται κατά την τρέχουσα προεκλογική περίοδο στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες ούτως, ώστε και να συνδράμω στην ενημέρωση όλων όσων ενδιαφέρονται, κυρίως όμως, να βοηθήσω τους Αμερικανούς πολίτες που ζουν στην χώρα μας, να αντιμετωπίσουν το όλο θέμα, μέσα από το πρίσμα ενός Έλληνα / Ευρωπαίου πολίτη, που θέλει να πιστεύει πως μπορεί να δει τα πράγματα όσο πιο αντικειμενικά γίνεται.



Οπωσδήποτε, οι Αμερικανικές προεδρικές προκριματικές εκλογές διαφέρουν και σε εικόνα και σε ποιότητα από οποιαδήποτε προεκλογική διαδικασία στις Ευρωπαϊκές χώρες. Αναμφισβήτητα, το ενδιαφέρον έχει επικεντρωθεί στο Δημοκρατικό κόμμα, τους Clinton και τον Barack Obama. Σε αυτό, συνέβαλλαν πολλοί λόγοι.

Η αποτυχία της διακυβέρνησης Bush να δώσει πειστικές απαντήσεις στα ερωτήματα-προβλήματα των Αμερικανών πολιτών και η μάλλον «παράδοξη» ανάπτυξη της εξωτερικής πολιτικής της χώρας τα τελευταία χρόνια, ήταν ένας από τους λόγους.

Η ισχυρή προσωπικότητα και ο χαρακτήρας της Hilary και του Barack και ο τρόπος διεκδίκησης των ψήφων στις μέχρι τώρα προκριματικές των Πολιτειών της Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, ήταν ένας άλλος.

Τον περασμένο Νοέμβριο, ο Obama βρισκόταν 20 μονάδες πίσω από την συνυποψήφιά του. Μέχρι και την ήττα της στην Πολιτεία της Iowa, η Hilary Clinton αντιμετωπιζόταν αν όχι ως η επόμενη Πρόεδρος των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών… τουλάχιστον, ως το φαβορί για την νίκη της ηγεσίας του Δημοκρατικού κόμματος. Πλέον, τα πράγματα είναι ρευστά. Μπορεί τα δάκρυά της να έπιασαν τόπο στο New Hampshire, οι πολίτες όμως γνωρίζουν ότι με δάκρυα δεν επιτυγχάνεται ισχυρή και αποτελεσματική διακυβέρνηση.

Αυτό κάθε αυτό το γεγονός, έδειξε αδυναμία (πράγμα κατανοητό), έδειξε και πολιτική ανεπάρκεια, καθώς φάνηκε να αμφισβητεί έστω και για λίγο τις πολιτικές της πεποιθήσεις και τα σχέδια διακυβέρνησης κι έτσι ακύρωσε τα «35 χρόνια εμπειρίας» που με τόσο σθένος προβάλει σε κάθε περίπτωση και ευκαιρία! Έδειξε πως η «καρέκλα» είναι αυτοσκοπός και πως το πραγματικό της ενδιαφέρον εστιάζεται μόνον στην ανάληψη της εξουσίας!

Η Hilary προχώρησε ένα βήμα πιο πέρα. Άρχισε να μέμφεται τον Obama, ενώ είχε δεσμευτεί για το αντίθετο, αναγνωρίζοντας το «πλεονέκτημά» της έναντι των άλλων υποψηφίων και άρχισε να χρησιμοποιεί τα ίδια συνθήματα του βασικού συνυποψήφιου της, προσπαθώντας παράλληλα να μεταβάλλει σιγά-σιγά την προεκλογική της τακτική.

Αξίζει να σημειώσουμε το γεγονός ότι ο Robert Reich στενός φίλος και συνεργάτης του Bill Clinton, έγραψε σε κάποιο blog ότι, τελικά, οι μομφές έναντι του Barack Obama, δεν θα ωφελήσουν κανένα και θα διώξει ψηφοφόρους αντί να φέρει…

Παράλληλα, η φυλετική αντιμετώπιση του Obama ως «μαύρου» και όχι ως υποψηφίου ο οποίος τυχαίνει να είναι μαύρος, από το στρατόπεδο των Clinton και κυρίως από τον ίδιο τον Bill Clinton, εξόργισε πλήθος ψηφοφόρων, κυρίως Αφρο-αμερικανών, παρά το γεγονός ότι ο ίδιος, ο Bill Clinton, παραμένει ιδιαίτερα δημοφιλής ως το «κακό παιδί»…

Ασφαλώς, ο ρόλος του Bill Clinton είναι καταλυτικός. Με Αμερικανούς στρατιώτες στο Ιράκ, με την τιμή του πετρελαίου να έχει εκτοξευθεί στα ύψη, με τον Osama bin Laden ελεύθερο, με 46,000,000 Αμερικανούς ανασφάλιστους, με ρεκόρ αύξησης του Εθνικού ελλείμματος, με υπαρκτό το πρόβλημα της λαθρομετανάστευσης, με την προβληματική εξωτερική πολιτική που παραδίδει η διακυβέρνηση Bush, με τα μεσαία εισοδήματα να συρρικνώνονται δραματικά, αμφιβάλλω πολύ για τον αν τα «35 χρόνια εμπειρίας» της Hilary Clinton μπορούν φέρουν την «Αλλαγή» που ευαγγελίζονται οι Δημοκρατικοί. Πέραν τούτου, τα λάθη συνεχίζονται. Μόλις προχθές αναφέρθηκε στα Σκόπια ως «Μακεδονία», πράγμα που δείχνει πως έχει σχηματοποιημένη άποψη, βασισμένη σε ελλιπή γνώση του θέματος. Άρα τι είδους εξωτερική πολιτική θα μπορούσε να ασκήσει;

Και αυτή δεν είναι μόνο η δική μου υποκειμενική άποψη. Εκατομμύρια Αμερικανών ψηφοφόρων σκέπτονται με τον ίδιο ακριβώς τρόπο. Στον αντίποδα, η έως τώρα επικράτηση του McCain από το στρατόπεδο των Ρεπουμπλικάνων, είναι ένα θέμα που προβληματίζει θετικά και βάζει σε σκέψεις τον μέσο ψηφοφόρο.

Ο John McCain φαντάζει απίστευτα ελκυστικός και η πιθανή ανάληψη της ηγεσίας του Ρεπουμπλικανικού κόμματος, θέτει σε κίνδυνο τα θεμέλια της πολιτικής των Clinton, καθώς ακυρώνει τα «35 χρόνια εμπειρίας». Για παράδειγμα: η Hilary επικαλείται αυτά τα 35 χρόνια, ως το καλλίτερο διαπιστευτήριο για την μετάβαση στον Λευκό Οίκο. Αν κοιτάξουμε 35 χρόνια πίσω, ο John McCain ήταν ήρωας πολέμου και η Hilary φοιτήτρια στην Νομική Σχολή του Harvard!

Οπωσδήποτε και ο Barack Obama, δεν μπορεί να συγκριθεί σε αυτό. Ούτε και χρειάζεται όμως. Ο Γερουσιαστής, επέλεξε τον δικό του δρόμο, χωρίς κυνισμό, χωρίς δαιμονοποίηση της αντίθετης γνώμης. Φαίνεται να έχει επίγνωση των απαιτήσεων έτσι, ώστε να δώσει νέα πνοή στους αραχνιασμένους δρόμους και διαδρόμους της Washington.

Δεν είναι τυχαίο άλλωστε ότι, μαζί με το Hollywood, και η οικογένεια Kennedy τάσσεται ανοικτά υπέρ του Γερουσιαστή από το Illinois. Δεν φοβούνται μάλιστα να τον συγκρίνουν με τον John Kennedy, ο οποίος αδιαμφισβήτητα ήταν ένας από τους καλλίτερους Προέδρους των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών.

Όμως, η επικράτηση του ενός ή του άλλου στην ηγεσία του κόμματος, είναι μόνο ο μισός δρόμος. Από κει και ύστερα αρχίζουν τα δύσκολα κι εκεί ακριβώς θα φανεί το όραμα διακυβέρνησης του μελλοντικού Προέδρου, όποιος και αν είναι αυτός.

Θα μπορέσουν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες να εγκαταλείψουν την «παλαιά» πολιτική;
Θα μπορέσουν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες να εφαρμόσουν μια πιο ορθολογική διακυβέρνηση σεβόμενοι διαφοροποιήσεις εντός και εκτός των τειχών;
Θα μπορέσουν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες να επαναφέρουν το βιοτικό επίπεδο των Αμερικανών πάλι, σε ικανοποιητική στάθμη;
Θα μπορέσουν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες να κάνουν την κοινωνική πρόνοια κτήμα όλων των πολιτών;
Θα μπορέσει η νέα διακυβέρνηση να επαναφέρει τη σιγουριά και την ασφάλεια στους Αμερικανούς πολίτες;
Θα μπορέσουν οι Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες να συνεργαστούν με τη διεθνή κοινότητα, με ίσους όρους, σε θέματα που μας απασχολούν όλους, όπως το περιβάλλον, η ασφάλεια, η οικονομία…;
Θα είναι σε θέση η νέα διακυβέρνηση να εγκαταλείψει την πολιτική των αδιεξόδων μέσα στο διεθνές πολιτικό / κοινωνικό / πολιτισμικό / μορφωτικό / οικολογικό γίγνεσθαι;



Πηγές: "Ελευθεροτυπία", "Έθνος", "Times", "Το Βήμα", "Embassy", "The Jordan Times", "The Amherst citizen", chouvi.blogspot.com