Κυριακή 17 Αυγούστου 2008

Άντε και καλή αρχή!

Με κλικ στην εικόνα, οδηγείστε στο scribd απ' όπου και μπορείτε να το κατεβάσετε 

Το πρώτο τεύχος του “Σελιδοδείκτη” είναι γεγονός! Αποτελεί, την πραγματοποίηση μιας ιδέας που στριφογύριζε μέσα στο μυαλό μου γι' αρκετό καιρό και χαίρομαι που σήμερα μπορώ να τη βλέπω ολοκληρωμένη στην οθόνη του ηλεκτρονικού μου υπολογιστή.

Τί είναι όμως ο “Σελιδοδείκτης”; Είναι ένας εύκολος τρόπος διαμοιρασμού και παρουσίασης των πιο δημοφιλών αναρτήσεων του ιστολογίου μου – το προτιμώ από ένα απλό newsletter, σύμφωνα με τα στατιστικά στοιχεία του statcounter.com... και όχι μόνον!

Όλοι μας ή τουλάχιστον οι περισσότεροι, θέλουμε να μπορούμε ελεύθερα να δημοσιεύουμε και να συζητάμε τις απόψεις μας, τις προτάσεις μας... Έτσι, και οι σκέψεις και οι γνώσεις μας αποκτούν νόημα και η πληροφόρηση δεν κινδυνεύει να χαθεί καθώς, οι δρόμοι της επικοινωνίας είναι αμφίδρομοι. Το διαδίκτυο παρέχει αυτή τη δυνατότητα και μάλιστα με οικονομία, μέσα από ιστολόγια και ιστοσελίδες. Κι εκεί ακριβώς είναι που αποτυγχάνει, πλέον, η έντυπη έκφραση!

Ο “Σελιδοδείκτης” είναι το επόμενο βήμα, που συπληρώνει ή ακόμη καλλίτερα, επεκτείνει με τρόπο οικείο και χρηστικό την προσωπική μου πολιτική και κοινωνική παρέμβαση μέσα από την συγγραφή.

Οπωσδήποτε, και θέλω να το τονίσω αυτό, η συγκεκριμένη προσπάθεια δεν επιδιώκει να υποκαταστήσει σε καμία περίπτωση το ιστολόγιο μου!

Η “Πολιτική Προσέγγιση” είναι και παραμένει χώρος προσωπικής έκφρασης!

Αυτό το πρώτο τεύχος έχει αρκετές ελλείψεις και χρήζει βελτιώσεων που, ευελπιστώ πως θα έρθουν με τον καιρό. Ο συνεχής εμπλουτισμός της θεματολογίας του είναι ένας ακόμη στόχος γι' αυτό και σας παρακαλώ να το κρίνετε με επιείκεια.

Σας εύχομαι καλή ανάγνωση!

Παρασκευή 15 Αυγούστου 2008

Why Russia’s response to Georgia was right

γράφει ο Sergei Lavrov

For some of those witnessing the fighting in the Caucasus over the past few days, the narrative is straightforward and easy. The plucky republic of Georgia, with just a few million citizens, was attacked by its giant eastern neighbour, Russia. Add to this all the stereotypes of the cold war era, and you are presented with a truly David and Goliath interpretation – with all its accompanying connotations of good and evil. While this version of events is being written in much of the western media, the facts present a different picture.

Let me be absolutely clear. This is not a conflict of Russia’s making; this is not a conflict of Russia’s choosing. There are no winners from this conflict. Hours before the Georgian invasion, Russia had been working to secure a United Nations Security Council statement calling for a renunciation of force by both Georgia and South Ossetians. The statement that could have averted bloodshed was blocked by western countries.

Last Friday, after the world’s leaders had arrived at the Beijing Olympics, Georgian troops launched an all-out assault on the region of South Ossetia, which has enjoyed de facto independence for more than 16 years. The majority of the region’s population are Russian citizens. Under the terms of the 1992 agreement to which Georgia is a party, they are afforded protection by a small number of Russian peacekeeping soldiers. The ground and air attack resulted in the killing of peacekeepers and the death of an estimated 1,600 civilians, creating a humanitarian disaster and leading to an exodus of 30,000 refugees. The Georgian regime refused to allow a humanitarian corridor to be established and bombarded a humanitarian convoy. There is also clear evidence of atrocities having been committed – so serious and systematic that they constitute acts of genocide.

There can be little surprise, therefore, that Russia responded to this unprovoked assault on its citizens by launching a military incursion into South Ossetia. No country in the world would idly stand by as its citizens are killed and driven from their homes. Russia repeatedly warned Tbilisi that it would protect its citizens by force if necessary, and its actions are entirely consistent with international law, including article 51 of the UN charter on the right of self-defence.

Russia has been entirely proportionate in its military response to Georgia’s attack on Russian citizens and peacekeepers. Russia’s tactical objective has been to force Georgian troops out of the region, which is off limits to them under international agreements. Despite Georgia’s assertion that it had imposed a unilateral ceasefire, Russian peacekeepers and supporting troops remained under continued attack – a fact confirmed by observers and journalists in the region. Russia had no choice but to target the military infrastructure outside the region being used to sustain the Georgian offensive. Russia’s response has been targeted, proportionate and legitimate.

Russia has been accused of using the conflict to try to topple the government and impose control over the country. This is palpable nonsense. Having established the safety of the region, the president has declared an end to military operations. Russia has no intention of annexing or occupying any part of Georgia and has again affirmed its respect for its sovereignty. Over the next few days, on the condition that Georgia refrains from military activity and keeps its forces out of the region, Russia will continue to take the diplomatic steps required to consolidate this temporary cessation of hostilities.

Mikheil Saakashvili, Georgia’s president, has stated that “unless we stop Russia, unless the whole world stops it, Russian tanks will go to any European capital tomorrow”, adding on a separate occasion that “it’s not about Georgia any more. It’s about America”. It is clear that Georgia wants this dispute to become something more than a short if bloody conflict in the region. For decision-makers in the Nato countries of the west, it would be worth considering whether in future you want the men and women of your armed services to be answerable to Mr Saakashvili’s declarations of war in the Caucasus.

Russia is a member of the Security Council, of the Group of Eight leading industrialised nations and partner with the west on issues as varied as the Middle East, Iran and North Korea. In keeping with its responsibilities as a world power and the guarantor of stability in the Caucasus, Russia will work to ensure a peaceful and lasting resolution to the situation in the region.

originally posted at Financial Times

Neocons Now Love International Law

γράφει ο Robert Parry

How can some justify the United States attacking Grenada or Nicaragua or Panama or Iraq or Serbia yet condemn the Russian involvement in Georgia? While major US news outlets may be comfortable wearing blinders that let them see only wrongdoing by others, the rest of the world views the outrage from Bush and the neocons over Russia as a stunning double standard.

It’s touching how American neoconservatives who have no regard for international law when they want to invade some troublesome country have developed a sudden reverence for national sovereignty.

Apparently, context is everything. So, the United States attacking Grenada or Nicaragua or Panama or Iraq or Serbia is justified even if the reasons sometimes don’t hold water or don’t hold up before the United Nations, The Hague or other institutions of international law.

However, when Russia attacks Georgia in a border dispute over Georgia’s determination to throttle secession movements in two semi-autonomous regions, everyone must agree that Georgia’s sovereignty is sacrosanct and Russia must be condemned.

US newspapers, such as the New York Times, see nothing risible about publishing a statement from President George W. Bush declaring that “Georgia is a sovereign nation and its territorial integrity must be respected.”

No one points out that Bush should have zero standing enunciating such a principle. Iraq also was a sovereign nation, but Bush invaded it under false pretenses, demolished its army, overthrew its government and then conducted a lengthy military occupation resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

The invasion of Iraq also wasn’t a spur of the moment decision. In the months after the 9/11 attacks, Bush proclaimed an exceptional right of the United States to invade any country that might become a threat to American security or to US global dominance. [For details, see Consortiumnews.com’s “Bush’s Grim Vision” or see our book, Neck Deep]

When asked questions about international law, Bush would joke: “International law? I better call my lawyer.”

The neocons’ contempt for international law goes back even further – to the 1980s and the illegal contra war against Nicaragua and the invasion of Panama. Only in the last few days have the neocons discovered an appreciation for multilateral institutions and the principles of non-intervention.

Despite this history, leading US newspapers don’t see hypocrisy. Instead, they have thrown open their pages to prominent neocons and other advocates of US-led invasions so these thinkers now can denounce Russia while not mentioning any contradictions.

originally posted at Byzantine Blog. Read the whole article here: 

update #1, 16/08/08: As things fall apart, by Max Bergmann, Democracy Arsenal:

... Perhaps the biggest foreign policy challenge for the next President is attempting to restore U.S. credibility and prestige around the world. McCain this week has shown exactly the wrong way to go about it. His recent over-the-top rhetoric about Georgia is exactly the wrong approach and reeks of the same neoconservative inspired thinking that emanated from Bush's first term. Making hollow promises and defiant threats, when the Bush administration just showed that such rhetoric to be completely hollow, only makes the U.S. look less credible (Of course, if McCain were actually serious about following through on his reckless rhetoric and militarily confronting Russia then that would not only be insane but would further imperil our superpower status)...